As I mentioned in my blog last week on panel management, the advantages of a well-maintained panel affect the quality of survey results, both from a researcher perspective and from a research participant perspective.
For a researcher, solid panel management helps authenticate panelists, allows gathering information about them over time, and enables monitoring their behavior and response rates as well as tracking the number of surveys they participate in. It also ensures the panel is used only for research purposes. It supports overall quality in terms of the depth and breadth of panelists available to answer questions, and enables a researcher to know they are collecting information from people who are the right fit for the type of research being conducted. Also, it means they are not over-surveyed – which compromises quality – and are not professional survey takers.
From the participant perspective, panel management ensures survey takers are rewarded fairly for their participation and that they are being asked to take surveys that relate uniquely to them so that:
- Their time is not wasted – for example, by avoiding repetitive questions that duplicate profiling questions (age, gender, occupation, etc.)
- The survey matches cultural values, behaviors, etc., of the person taking the survey.
With the goal of market research being to gather data to drive informed decisions, the research industry cannot afford to overlook the well-being of research participants.
If researchers don’t adhere to treating survey takers properly, they risk collecting inaccurate data, and, therefore, jeopardize important decision-making ordinarily based on vetted and accurate information.
The recent Consumer Participation in Research (CPR) Report by GreenBook explores the impact of poorly designed surveys on research quality, and research participants’ views of research.
According to Leonard Murphy from GreenBook, “People have a choice on how they spend their time, and if we are asking for some of that time and don’t make it a good experience then we run the risk of becoming like that friend or family member who always is asking for a favor of some kind (that we don’t want to do), so we just start ignoring them as much as possible. Or even worse, research starts to be equated with other unpleasant things like going to the DMV, preparing taxes, dental appointments, or cleaning cat litter boxes!”
To combat this, Research Now has incorporated the viewpoints of both the research participants and the researchers into our Total Research Quality™ System, which aims to preserve panelist experience. Our system is comprehensive, including tools, metrics, procedures, and policies across the panelist lifecycle of each panelist and every completed project to validate the accuracy, consistency, and reliability of the data collected.
It not only ensures both researchers and the participants gain positive experiences from market research, but that the subsequent data yields quality results. Which, in my opinion, is a win-win for all.
White Paper: A Guide to Becoming an Educated Consumer of Digital Research Data
Done well, market research provides critical information for successful decision making for both B2C and B2B companies, ultimately delivering better results and a competitive advantage. Therefore, the decision about which company you choose to source your research sample from should be made knowledgeably.
This new white paper by Research Now aims to educate buyers of digital research data by defining the different kinds of participant data available for research surveys and the key considerations to bear in mind when choosing a research sample provider. Download your copy by clicking below.
